Issues with requestValidationMode="2.0" and validateRequest="false"
By : Waqas
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
it should still fix some issue you also need to add ValidateInput(false) to your action if you are dealing with MVC. or add deriective on the page if you are working on web forms
|
requestvalidationmode="2.0" validaterequest="false" in web.config not working
By : user3512597
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
To fix this issue I wouldn't even try to enable this on a site-wide level in the web.config file - just do it per page, when you know specifically input data is safe: code :
<%@ Page ... ValidateRequest="false" %>
<umbraco:DisableRequestValidation runat="server" />
|
validateRequest="false" not working, even with requestValidationMode="2.0"
By : user3648275
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I think the issue was by ths following , I hadn't realised, but I'd accidentally added these settings within a location tag created by WIF: code :
<location path="FederationMetadata">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
<!-- wrong! -->
</system.web>
</location>
<system.web>
<!-- right! -->
<httpRuntime requestValidationMode="2.0" />
<pages validateRequest="false" />
|
<pages validateRequest="false" /> and <httpRuntime requestValidationMode="2.0" /> not wo
By : Byte Punk
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will help you In addition to what you did you also have to decorate your methods with the ValidateInput attribute. code :
[ValidateInput(false)]
public ActionResult MyActionMethod(string myParameter)
{
// Method implementation goes here...
}
<httpRuntime requestValidationType=”Globals.CustomRequestValidation”/>
|
What are the security implications of using ValidateRequest="false" to circumvent "A potentially dangerou
By : user2907663
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
Does that help To expand on CodeCaster's comment, this is definitely a dangerous thing to do. You're allowing users to enter information which means that a savvy user will now be able to play around with your site internals.
|