Ternary operation in asp.net in vb.net
By : Vamsi paluri
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
I wish this helpful for you Am trying to add an 'odd' class to a table row in a repeater control.. , you should use only = instead of == and use mod
|
Modulo operation vs. Ternary operation
By : user6279021
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
it should still fix some issue You mentioned that it would look ugly if you do the 'maaaany' lines separately. None of the above options are particularly pretty either. So perhaps it's better to encapsulate this ugly logic in a method and use some more elegant code in your loop. For readability, I'd probably go with this: code :
for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++){
DoStuff(i, i + 1);
}
DoStuff(n - 1, 0);
// elsewhere
void DoStuff(int a, int b)
{
//MaaaanyLinesOfDoSomethingWithAAndB
}
Action<int, int> doStuff = (a, b) =>
{
//MaaaanyLinesOfDoSomethingWithAAndB
};
for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++){
doStuff(i, i + 1);
}
doStuff(n - 1, 0);
|
"warning: operation of ... may be undefined" for ternary operation -- not if/else block
By : Yiaannn
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
This might help you They are not equivalent. Note that in the ternary operator expression, you assigned the result to test Change the if condition to: code :
if(anotherInt > test)
test = test++; // undefined!
|
LINQ operation with ternary operation causing tests to fail if logic is swapped
By : Neha Hande
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
will be helpful for those in need The issue is that you aren't actually swapping the logic in your second line of code. To fully swap the logic, you would need to negate the if statement like so: code :
return Regex.Split(number, @"[^\d-]")
.Select(d => !Regex.IsMatch(d, @"[^\d-]") ? 0 : int.Parse(d.TrimEnd('-')))
.Where(d => d <= 1000).ToList();
|
ternary operation in js
By : arti pathak
Date : March 29 2020, 07:55 AM
wish helps you Maybe I do not understand ternary operation but , just do like this : code :
function toto(x, y)
{
return (x > 0 ? x < 7 ? true : false : false ) &&
( y > 0 ? y < 6 ? true : false : false)
}
return (x > 0 && x < 7) && (y > 0 && y < 6)
|